UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party Other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the Appropriate Box

NOV Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Persons(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box):

NOV INC.

7909 Parkwood Circle Drive

Houston, Texas 77036

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held May 19, 2021

The 2021 annual meeting of stockholders (“Annual Meeting”) of NOV Inc. will be held at the Company’s corporate headquarters located at 7909 Parkwood Circle Drive, Houston, Texas 77036 on Wednesday, May 19, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. Houston time, for the following purposes:

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of the nine nominees for director (Proposal 1), “FOR” the proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Auditors of the Company for 2021 (Proposal 2), and “FOR” the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal 3).

Beginning on or about April 9, 2021, the Company is mailing a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to our stockholders of record as of the record date (but excluding those stockholders who have previously requested a printed copy of our proxy materials) containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials (including our 2020 annual report) via the Internet, as well as instructions on voting shares via the Internet. The Notice also contains instructions on how to request a printed copy of the proxy materials by mail or an electronic copy of the proxy materials by email.

The Board of Directors has set March 22, 2021 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. If you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on March 22, 2021, you are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. A complete list of these stockholders will be available for examination at the Annual Meeting and during ordinary business hours at our offices at 7909 Parkwood Circle Drive, Houston, Texas for a period of ten days prior to the Annual Meeting.

You are cordially invited to join us at the Annual Meeting. However, to ensure your representation, we request that you vote via the Internet using the instructions in the Notice or, if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials, return your signed proxy card at your earliest convenience, whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. You may revoke your proxy at any time if you wish to attend and vote in person.

By Order of the Board of Directors

/s/ Craig L. Weinstock

Craig L. Weinstock

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Houston, Texas

April 9, 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOV INC.

7909 Parkwood Circle Drive

Houston, Texas 77036

PROXY STATEMENT

Except as otherwise specifically noted in this Proxy Statement, the “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us,” and similar words in this Proxy Statement refer to NOV Inc.

- 1 -

- 2 -

- 3 -

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the

Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on Wednesday, May 19, 2021.

The Company’s 2021 Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended 2020 are also available at: http://www.proxyvote.com

For directions to the Annual Meeting, please contact investor relations at 713-346-7500.

PLEASE VOTE — YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

- 4 -

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

PROPOSAL NO. 1 ON THE PROXY CARD

Clay C. Williams, Greg L. Armstrong, Marcela E. Donadio, Ben A. Guill, James T. Hackett, David D. Harrison, Eric L. Mattson, Melody B. Meyer and William R. Thomas are nominees for directors for a one-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting in 2022, or when their successors are elected and qualified. Each of the nominees was elected as a director at the 2020 Annual Meeting. We believe each of the nominees will be able to serve if elected. However, if any nominee is unable to serve, the remaining members of the Board have authority to nominate another person, elect a substitute, or reduce the size of the Board. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.

Vote Required for Approval

NOV Inc.’s Bylaws require that each director be elected by the majority of votes cast with respect to such director in uncontested elections (i.e., the number of shares voted “for” a director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that nominee). In a contested election (i.e., a situation in which the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected), the standard for election of directors would be a plurality of the shares represented in person or by proxy at any such meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. Whether an election is contested or not is determined as of a date that is 14 days in advance of when we file our definitive proxy statement with the SEC. This year’s election was determined to be an uncontested election, and the majority vote standard will apply. If a nominee who is serving as a director is not elected at the annual meeting, Delaware law provides that the director would continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” However, under our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, each director must submit an advance, contingent, irrevocable resignation that the Board may accept if the director fails to be elected through a majority vote. In that situation, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee would make a recommendation to the Board about whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether to take other action. The Board will act on the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date the election results are certified. If a nominee who was not already serving as a director fails to receive a majority of votes cast at the annual meeting, Delaware law provides that the nominee does not serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” All director nominees are currently serving on the Board.

Brokers are not permitted to vote your shares on the election of directors in the absence of your specific instructions as to how to vote. Please provide your broker with voting instructions so that your vote can be counted.

Key Attributes, Experience and Qualifications

The Company believes that each member of its Board of Directors possesses the basic attributes of being a director of the Company, namely having a reputation for integrity, honesty, candor, fairness and discretion. Each director has also become knowledgeable in major aspects of the Company’s business and operations, which has allowed the Board to provide better oversight functions to the Company. The Company considered the foregoing factors in determining that the board member should serve on the Board.

- 5 -

CLAY C. WILLIAMS, 58

		Mr. Williams has been a Director of the Company since November 2013 and Chairman of the Board since May 2014. Mr. Williams has served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer since February 2014 and as the Company’s President since December 2012. Mr. Williams served as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer from December 2012 until February 2014. Mr. Williams previously served as the Company’s Executive Vice President from February 2009 and as the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from March 2005 until December 2012. He served as Varco’s Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from January 2003 until its merger with the Company on March 11, 2005. From May 2002 until January 2003, Mr. Williams served as Varco’s Vice President Finance and Corporate Development. From February 2001 until May 2002, and from February 1997 until February 2000, he served as Varco’s VP-Corporate Development.   Mr. Williams has been an officer of a publicly traded company since 1997, occupying positions of increasing importance from VP-Corporate Development, to Senior VP and CFO, to President and COO, to President and CEO. Mr. Williams has extensive experience with the Company and the oil service industry. Mr. Williams has an MBA degree from the University of Texas at Austin, as well as a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil/Geological Engineering from Princeton University. Mr. Williams has also gained valuable outside board experience from his tenure as a director of Benchmark Electronics, Inc.

GREG L. ARMSTRONG, 62

		Mr. Armstrong has been a Director of the Company since March 2005 and previously served as a Director of Varco from May 20, 2004 until its merger with the Company on March 11, 2005. Mr. Armstrong is a co-founder and former Chairman and CEO of Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., a publicly traded master limited partnership engaged in the business of marketing, gathering, transporting, terminalling and storing crude oil. Mr. Armstrong retired as CEO of Plains in October 2018 and as Chairman in December 2019 and continues to serve as a member of its board of directors. Mr. Armstrong has been a director of The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas since 2015, currently serving as Chairman, and was elected to the board of Memorial Hermann Healthcare System in 2021. He is a member of the adjunct faculty for the University of Oklahoma’s Executive MBA in Energy program and the Advisory Board of the Cox School’s Maguire Energy Institute at Southern Methodist University and is the immediate past Chairman of the National Petroleum Council.   Mr. Armstrong has over 35 years of experience being a certified public accountant (currently inactive) and eight years of experience serving as a chief financial officer. Mr. Armstrong has been an officer of a publicly traded energy company since 1981, occupying positions of increasing importance ranging from controller, to CFO, to COO and CEO, the latter of which spanned 26 years. Through service in these roles, he gained extensive experience in assessing the risks associated with various energy industry cycles. He has also gained valuable outside board experience from his previous tenure as a director of BreitBurn Energy Partners.

- 6 -

MARCELA E. DONADIO, 66

		Ms. Donadio has been a Director of the Company since April 2014. She was the Americas Oil & Gas Sector Leader of Ernst & Young LLP, from which she retired in March 2014. Ms. Donadio joined Ernst & Young LLP in 1976, serving since 1989 as audit partner for multiple companies in the oil and gas industry. She held various energy industry leadership positions until being named Americas Oil & Gas Sector Leader in 2007. In that role, she was responsible for one of the firm’s most significant industry groups in the U.S. and throughout the Americas. Ms. Donadio also served as spokesperson of the firm on business and industry issues affecting energy companies, including those relevant to accounting standards. Ms. Donadio also serves as a director of Marathon Oil Corporation, an energy company, and Norfolk Southern Corporation, a transportation company.   Ms. Donadio provides valuable service and experience to the Audit Committee, due to her 37 years of audit and public accounting experience with a specialization in domestic and international operations in all segments of the energy industry. Ms. Donadio has in-depth experience on numerous audit engagements of global energy companies conducted in compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and under the financial reporting requirements of the SEC. Ms. Donadio earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from Louisiana State University and is a licensed certified public accountant in the State of Texas.

BEN A. GUILL, 70

		Mr. Guill has served as a Director of the Company since 1999. He is a Managing Partner of White Deer Energy, a middle market private equity fund focused on energy investments. Until April 2007, he was President of First Reserve Corporation, a corporate manager of private investments focusing on the energy and energy-related sectors, which he joined in September 1998. Prior to joining First Reserve, Mr. Guill was the Managing Director and Co-head of Investment Banking of Simmons & Company International, an investment-banking firm specializing in the oil service industry.   Mr. Guill has an MBA degree and 25 years of experience in investment banking and 19 years of experience in private equity. Mr. Guill also served as president of a private investment firm focused on the energy sector. Mr. Guill has over 38 years of experience in the energy industry as an investment banker and private equity investor. Mr. Guill has also gained valuable outside board experience from his previous tenures as a director of: Emerald Oil, Inc., Dresser, Inc., Quanta Services, Inc., T-3 Energy Services, Inc., Chart Industries, Inc. and the general partner of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.

- 7 -

JAMES T. HACKETT, 67

		Mr. Hackett has been a Director of the Company since April 2016. From February 2018 to February 2020, Mr. Hackett served as the Chairman of Alta Mesa Resources, Inc., an independent oil, gas, and NGL producer, gatherer, processor and transporter. Mr. Hackett was a Senior Advisor and Partner at Riverstone Holdings, LLC, an energy focused private investment firm from June 2013 to March 2020. Mr. Hackett also served as the Chairman of the Board from 2006 to 2013 and the Chief Executive Officer from 2003 to 2012 of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. Before joining Anadarko, Mr. Hackett served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Devon Energy Corporation, following its merger with Ocean Energy, where he had served as Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Hackett has held senior positions at Seagull, Duke Energy, and Pan Energy. He also held positions in engineering, finance and marketing with NGC Corp., Burlington Resources, and Amoco Oil Corp. Mr. Hackett also serves as a director of Enterprise Products Holdings, LLC and Fluor Corporation.   Through the various leadership positions he has held with several publicly traded energy companies, Mr. Hackett has gained valuable knowledge of the oil and gas industry and extensive experience in assessing the risks associated with various energy industry cycles. Mr. Hackett received a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Illinois in 1975, a Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business School in 1979 and a Master of Theological Studies from Harvard Divinity School in 2016. Mr. Hackett has also gained valuable outside board experience from his previous tenures as a director of: Cameron International, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Bunge, Ltd., Halliburton Corporation, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and Temple-Inland, Inc, to name a few.

DAVID D. HARRISON, 73

		Mr. Harrison has been a Director of the Company since August 2003. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pentair, Inc., a diversified manufacturer in water technologies and enclosures businesses, from February 2000 until his retirement in February 2007. He also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pentair, Inc. from 1994 to 1996. From 1972 through 1994, Mr. Harrison held various domestic and international finance positions with a combination of General Electric and Borg-Warner Chemicals. Mr. Harrison served as a director of Navistar International Corporation until his retirement from the Board in October 2012. Navistar is a holding company whose wholly owned subsidiaries produce International® brand commercial trucks. Mr. Harrison also serves as a director of James Hardie Industries, a leading fiber cement technology company.   Mr. Harrison provides valuable service and experience to the Audit Committee, due to his 29 years of being a certified management accountant and 15 years of experience serving as a chief financial officer and chief accounting officer of publicly traded companies. Mr. Harrison has 49 years of continuous

- 8 -

ERIC L. MATTSON, 69

		Mr. Mattson has been a Director of the Company since March 2005. Mr. Mattson served as a Director of Varco (and its predecessor, Tuboscope Inc.) from January 1994 until its merger with the Company on March 11, 2005. Mr. Mattson served as the EVP-Finance of Select Energy Services, Inc., a public oil service company located in Houston until his retirement in March 2018. Mr. Mattson also served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of VeriCenter, Inc., a private provider of managed hosting services, from 2003 until its acquisition in August 2007. From November 2002 until October 2003, Mr. Mattson worked as an independent consultant. Mr. Mattson was the Chief Financial Officer of Netrail, Inc., a private Internet backbone and broadband service provider, from September 1999 until November 2002. From July 1993 until May 1999, Mr. Mattson served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Baker Hughes Incorporated, a provider of products and services to the oil, gas and process industries. Mr. Mattson also serves as a director of Holly Energy Partners L.P. Mr. Mattson previously served as a director of Rex Energy Corporation until November 2018.   Mr. Mattson has an MBA degree and 44 years of financial experience, including 25 years as a chief financial officer of four different companies. Mr. Mattson has extensive experience in the oil service business, having worked in that industry for over 35 years. He also has extensive mergers and acquisitions experience of over 35 years on a global basis. Mr. Mattson has dealt with all facets of potential risk areas for a global energy service company, as a former chief financial officer of Baker Hughes, and brings that experience and perspective to the Company.

MELODY B. MEYER, 63

		Ms. Meyer has been a Director of the Company since September 2017. Ms. Meyer was with Chevron for over 37 years and held various positions of increasing responsibility, including managing domestic and international operations, managing strategy and planning and leading new technology development for the organization. Ms. Meyer was the President of Chevron Asia Pacific Exploration and Production from 2011 until her retirement in 2016. Prior to that, Ms. Meyer served as the President of the Chevron Energy Technology Company from 2008 to 2011 and the Vice President of Chevron’s Gulf of Mexico business unit from 2004 to 2008. Ms. Meyer also serves as a director of BP p.l.c. and AbbVie Inc.   Ms. Meyer provides valuable service and experience to the Audit Committee, due to her experience as a former long serving executive at Chevron. Ms. Meyer has extensive experience in the upstream oil

- 9 -

WILLIAM R. THOMAS, 68

		Mr. Thomas has been a Director of the Company since November 2015. Mr. Thomas has been serving as the Chairman and CEO of EOG Resources, Inc. since January 2014. Prior to that, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer from July 2013 through December 2013 and as President from September 2011 to July 2013. Mr. Thomas previously held other leadership positions at EOG Resources, Inc., including Senior Executive Vice President, Exploitation and Senior Executive Vice President, Exploration. Mr. Thomas has been with EOG Resources, Inc. and its predecessor companies since 1979.   Mr. Thomas provides valuable service and experience to the Audit Committee, due to his over seven years of experience serving as a director of, and as the Chief Executive Officer of, EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG). Mr. Thomas has been with EOG and its predecessor companies for over 42 years. Through his service at EOG and various leadership positions held with EOG, he has gained valuable knowledge of the oil and gas industry and extensive experience in assessing the risks associated with various energy industry cycles. Mr. Thomas received a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology from Texas A&M University in 1975.

Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of the nine nominees for director.

- 10 -

COMMITTEES AND MEETINGS OF THE BOARD

Committees

The Board of Directors appoints committees to help carry out its duties. The Board of Directors has the following standing committees: Audit, Compensation, and Nominating/Corporate Governance. Last year, the Board of Directors met seven times and the committees met a total of 13 times. As an employee of the Company, Mr. Williams does not serve on any committees. The following table sets forth the committees of the Board of Directors and their members during 2020, as well as the number of meetings each committee held during 2020:

Attendance at Meetings

Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and committees of which that director was a serving member.

Audit Committee

Mr. Harrison (Chair), Ms. Donadio, Ms. Meyer and Mr. Thomas are the current members of the Audit Committee. All members of this committee are “independent” within the meaning of the rules governing audit committees by the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE.

The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities. The Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities are to:

- 11 -

A copy of the Audit Committee Charter is available on the Company’s website, www.nov.com, under the Investors/Corporate Governance section.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Audit Committee meet the NYSE standard of having accounting or related financial management expertise and meet the SEC’s criteria of an Audit Committee Financial Expert.

Compensation Committee

Mr. Guill (Chair), Mr. Mattson and Mr. Thomas are the current members of the Compensation Committee. All members of the Compensation Committee are independent as defined by the applicable NYSE listing standards.

The Compensation Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities. The Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities are to:

A copy of the Compensation Committee Charter is available on the Company’s website, www.nov.com, under the Investors/Corporate Governance section.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation. Mr. Guill, Mr. Mattson and Mr. Thomas served on the Compensation Committee during 2020. None of these members is a former or current officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, is involved in a relationship requiring disclosure as an interlocking executive officer/director, or had any relationship requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee

Mr. Mattson (Chair), Ms. Donadio, Mr. Hackett and Ms. Meyer are the current members of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. All members of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are independent as defined by the applicable NYSE listing standards.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities. The Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities are to:

- 12 -

A copy of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Charter is available on the Company’s website, www.nov.com, under the Investors/Corporate Governance section.

- 13 -

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Director Nomination Process and Diversity Considerations

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee has the responsibility of identifying candidates for election as directors, reviewing background information relating to candidates for director, and recommending to the Board of Directors nominees for directors to be submitted to stockholders for election. It is the policy of the Committee to consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. Nominees to be evaluated by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are selected by the Committee from candidates recommended by multiple sources, including other directors, management, stockholders, and candidates identified by independent search firms (which firms may be paid by the Company for their services), all of whom will be evaluated based on the same criteria. As of March 22, 2021, we had not received any recommendations from stockholders for potential director candidates. All of the current nominees for director are standing members of the Board that are proposed by the entire Board for re-election. Written suggestions for nominees should be addressed to: Craig L. Weinstock, Secretary, NOV Inc., 7909 Parkwood Circle Drive, Houston, Texas 77036.

The Board of Directors believes that nominees should reflect the following characteristics:

The Board values diversity and seeks to achieve a mix of directors that represents a diversity of viewpoints, backgrounds and experiences. The Board considers diversity in a variety of different ways and in a fairly expansive manner when identifying nominees for director. In evaluating the overall qualifications of a prospective nominee, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and Board will take into account the individual’s professional experience, experience in the oil and gas industry, education, skills, gender, race and other qualities and attributes that contribute to board heterogeneity.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee reviews Board composition annually to ensure that the Board reflects the knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, and diversity required for the Board to fulfill its duties. If and when the need arises for the Company to add a new director to the Board, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will take every reasonable step to ensure that diverse candidates (including, without limitation, women and minority candidates) are in the pool from which nominees are chosen and strive to obtain diverse candidates by searching in traditional corporate environments, as well as government, academia, and non-profit organizations.

- 14 -

The following are some of the key skills and experience, as well as background details of our Board.

Nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors may be made at an annual or special meeting of stockholders by any stockholder entitled to vote for the election of directors at the meeting, who complies with the notice procedures set forth in Article II, Section 9 of our Amended and Restated Bylaws dated as of January 1, 2021 (the “Bylaws”), and who is a stockholder of record both at the time of the giving of notice provided for in Article II, Section 9 of the Bylaws and at the time of the meeting. Such nominations shall be made pursuant to timely notice in writing to our Secretary. To be timely under Article II, Section 9 of the Bylaws, a stockholder’s notice must be delivered to and received by our Secretary at our principal executive offices by hand or by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested: (i) with respect to an election to be held at an annual meeting of stockholders, not less than one hundred twenty (120) days nor more than one hundred fifty (150) days prior to the first anniversary of the date on which we released our proxy materials for the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event the annual meeting of stockholders is to be held more than thirty (30) days before or more than thirty (30) days after the first anniversary of the date of the preceding year’s annual meeting, not less than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the date of such annual meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the public announcement of the date of such annual meeting; and (ii) with respect to an election to be held at a special meeting of stockholders, other than a request of a stockholder or stockholders pursuant to Article II, Section 4 of the Bylaws requesting that a special meeting be called to elect Directors pursuant to the requirements of that section, not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the first public announcement of the date of such special meeting. In no event shall any adjournment, rescheduling or postponement of a meeting commence a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of a stockholder’s notice. Article II, Section 9 of the Bylaws prescribes specific information that must be included in a stockholder’s notice, eligibility requirements for the proposed nominee and other requirements for a valid nomination. With respect to our annual meeting of stockholders for 2022, a stockholder’s notice to nominate a person for election as director must be received no earlier than November 10, 2021 and no later than December 10, 2021. Article II, Section 10 of the Bylaws prescribes the procedures and requirements for inclusion of a stockholder nominee in our proxy materials.

- 15 -

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The responsibilities of the Audit Committee, which are set forth in the Audit Committee Charter adopted by the Board of Directors, include providing oversight to the Company’s financial reporting process through periodic combined and separate meetings with the Company’s independent auditors and management to review accounting, auditing, internal controls and financial reporting matters. The management of the Company is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the financial reporting information and related systems of internal controls. The Audit Committee, in carrying out its role, relies on the Company’s senior management, including senior financial management, and its independent auditors.

The Board of Directors has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are independent based on the guidelines set forth by the NYSE and SEC rules for the independence of Audit Committee members. The Audit Committee held nine meetings in 2020. During the quarterly in person and virtual meetings of the committee, the Audit Committee met separately in executive session with the Internal Audit Vice President, the Chief Compliance Officer, the Senior Vice President and General Counsel, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and the independent audit partner, without management being present.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with senior management the audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Management has confirmed to the Audit Committee that such financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent external audit firm retained to audit the Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent external auditor for fiscal year 2020. The Audit Committee pre-approves the audit fees for all audit services provided by Ernst & Young LLP.

The Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent auditors, the matters required to be discussed under the applicable rules of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), which require independent auditors to communicate certain matters related to the conduct of an audit to those who have responsibility for oversight of the financial reporting process. Among the matters to be communicated to the audit committee are: (1) methods used to account for significant unusual transactions; (2) the effect of critical and significant accounting policies in controversial or emerging areas for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus; (3) the process used by management in formulating particularly sensitive accounting estimates and the basis for the auditor’s conclusions regarding the reasonableness of those estimates; (4) critical audit matters which were material and involved especially challenging, subjective or complex judgements; and (5) disagreements with management over the application of accounting principles, the basis for management’s accounting estimates, and the disclosures in the financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee reviewed with Ernst & Young LLP their judgment as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles.

The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, regarding Ernst & Young LLP’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed Ernst & Young LLP’s independence with Ernst & Young LLP.

Based on the foregoing, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

- 16 -

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Audit Committee’s charter clarifies that it is not the Audit Committee’s duty to conduct audits or to determine that the Company’s financial statements are complete and accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Management is responsible for the Company’s financial reporting process, including its system of internal controls, and for the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Management is also responsible for assuring compliance with laws and regulations and the Company’s corporate policies, subject to the Audit Committee’s oversight in the areas covered by the Audit Committee’s charter. The independent auditors are responsible for expressing opinions on those financial statements and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Members of the Audit Committee

David D. Harrison, Committee Chair

Marcela E. Donadio

Melody B. Meyer

William R. Thomas

- 17 -

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

PROPOSAL NO. 2 ON THE PROXY CARD

Information Regarding our Independent Auditors

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has reappointed Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for 2021. Stockholders are being asked to vote upon the ratification of the appointment. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will attend the Annual Meeting, where they will be available to respond to appropriate questions and have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire.

Vote Required for Approval

The proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors will require approval of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote and present in person or by proxy. In accordance with NYSE rules, a proposal to ratify independent auditors is considered to be a “discretionary” item. This means that brokerage firms may vote in their discretion on this matter on behalf of beneficial owners who have not furnished voting instructions within the time period specified in the voting instructions submitted by such brokerage firms. Abstentions, which will be counted as votes present for the purpose of determining a quorum, will have the effect of a vote against the proposal. Your shares will be voted as you specify on your proxy. If your properly executed proxy does not specify how you want your shares voted, we will vote them for the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors.

Audit Fees

The Audit Committee pre-approves all services provided by the Company’s independent auditors to the Company and its subsidiaries. Consideration and approval of such services generally occurs in the regularly scheduled quarterly meetings of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has delegated the Audit Committee Chair to pre-approve allowed non-audit services, subject to review by the full committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of all services other than those rendered for the audit of the Company’s financial statements is compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young LLP’s independence and has concluded that their independence is not compromised.

The following table sets forth Ernst & Young LLP’s fees for services rendered during 2020 and 2019. All services provided by Ernst & Young LLP were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP.

- 18 -

APPROVAL OF COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

PROPOSAL NO. 3 ON THE PROXY CARD

A proposal will be presented at the meeting asking stockholders to approve on an advisory basis the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as described in this proxy statement.

Why You Should Approve our Executive Compensation Program

The Company’s compensation philosophy is designed to attract and retain executive talent and emphasize pay for performance, including the creation of stockholder value and when required, the reduction in costs as needed to preserve shareholder value. The Company encourages its stockholders to read the Executive Compensation section of this proxy statement, including the compensation tables, as well as the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) section of this proxy statement, for a more detailed discussion of our compensation programs and policies. The Company believes its compensation programs and policies are appropriate and effective in implementing its compensation philosophy and in achieving its goals, and that they are aligned with stockholder interests and worthy of continued stockholder support.

In the past, our stockholders have overwhelmingly approved the compensation of our named executive officers. In May 2020, our stockholders approved, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers with approximately 95% of stockholder votes cast in favor of our say-on-pay resolution. We believe this strong result indicates general approval from our stockholders of the Company’s existing approach to its compensation programs and policies.

We believe that stockholders should consider the following in determining whether to approve this proposal:

Heavily Weighted Towards Long-Term Incentives

- 19 -

Summary of Good Governance and Risk Mitigating Factors

The Company’s compensation program for its named executive officers has been thoughtfully designed to support the Company’s long-term business strategies and drive creation of stockholder value. During challenging market conditions such as those experienced over the past few years, the program is designed to incentivize proactive measures to reduce operating costs, such as workforce reductions and facility closures. The program does not encourage excessive risk-taking by management. Nor does it encourage sacrificing longer-term investments that will create shareholder value over a long-term horizon. It strikes a balance of incentivizing necessary short-term tactical measures with the continued cultivation of longer-term corporate opportunities. It is aligned with the competitive market for talent, and highly sensitive to Company performance. The Company believes its program delivers reasonable pay that is strongly linked to Company performance over time.

The following resolution will be submitted for a stockholder vote at the 2021 annual meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of the Company approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers listed in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table included in the proxy statement for this meeting, as such compensation is disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K in this proxy statement under the section entitled “Executive Compensation”, including the compensation tables and other narrative executive compensation disclosures set forth under that section, as well as the section in the proxy statement entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”.”

- 20 -

This advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers gives stockholders another mechanism to convey their views about the Company’s compensation programs and policies. Although your vote on executive compensation is not binding on the Company, the Board values the views of stockholders. The Board and Compensation Committee will review the results of the vote and take them into consideration in addressing future compensation policies and decisions.

Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal to approve the

compensation of our named executive officers.

- 21 -

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

NOV Inc.’s Board of Directors is committed to promoting transparency in reporting information about the Company, complying with the spirit as well as the literal requirements of applicable laws, rules and regulations, and corporate behavior that conforms to corporate governance standards that substantially exceed the consensus view of minimum acceptable corporate governance standards. The Board of Directors adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines which established provisions for the Board’s composition and function, Board committees and committee membership, evaluation of director independence, the roles of the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer and the Lead Director, the evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer, regular meetings of non-employee directors, board conduct and review, selection and orientation of directors, director compensation, access to management and independent advisors, and annual review of the Corporate Governance Guidelines. A copy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines is available on the Company’s website, www.nov.com, under the Investors/Corporate Governance section. The Company will furnish print copies of the Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as its Committee charters, to interested stockholders without charge, upon request. Written requests for such copies should be addressed to: Craig L. Weinstock, Secretary, NOV Inc., 7909 Parkwood Circle Drive, Houston, Texas 77036.

Director Independence

The Corporate Governance Guidelines address, among other things, standards for evaluating the independence of the Company’s directors. The Board undertakes an annual review of director independence and considers transactions and relationships during the prior year between each director or any member of his or her immediate family and the Company and its affiliates, including those reported under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in this Proxy Statement. As a result of this annual review, the Board affirmatively determined that a majority of the members of the Board of Directors are independent of the Company and its management under the standards set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines. The following directors were affirmed as independent: Greg L. Armstrong, Marcela E. Donadio, Ben A. Guill, James T. Hackett, David D. Harrison, Eric L. Mattson, Melody B. Meyer and William R. Thomas.

Board Leadership

Currently, the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are combined at the Company. The Company believes that effective corporate governance, including the independent oversight of management, does not require that the Chairman of the Board be an independent director or that the offices of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer be separated. The Company believes that its stockholders are best served by a Board that has the flexibility to establish a leadership structure that fits the needs of the Company at a particular point in time.

The Board believes that our current Chief Executive Officer is best situated to serve as Chairman because Mr. Williams is the director most familiar with our business and most capable of effectively identifying strategic priorities and leading the discussion and execution of our strategy. The Board also believes that the combined role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer facilitates information flow between management and the Board.

To assist with providing independent oversight of management and the Company’s strategy, the non-employee members of the Board of Directors have appointed Greg L. Armstrong, an independent director, as Lead Director. The Lead Director is responsible for: (1) developing the agenda for, and presiding over the executive sessions of, the Board’s non-management directors, (2) facilitating communications between the Chairman of the Board and other members of the Board, (3) coordinating, with the Chairman, the assessment of the committee structure, organization, and charters, and evaluating the need for any changes, (4) acting as principal liaison between the non-management directors and the Chief Executive Officer on matters dealt with in executive session, and (5) assuming such further tasks as the independent directors may determine.

- 22 -

The Board also holds executive sessions on a quarterly basis at which only non-employee directors are present. In addition, the committees of the Board provide independent oversight of management. Each of the committees of the Board is composed entirely of independent directors.

The Board has concluded that the combined role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, together with an independent Lead Director having the duties described above, is in the best interest of stockholders because it provides an appropriate balance between our Chairman’s ability to lead the Board and the Company and the ability of our independent directors, under the leadership of our Lead Director, to provide independent objective oversight of our management.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors and its committees help conduct certain risk oversight functions for the Company. The Board is periodically advised on the status of various factors that could impact the business and operating results of the Company, including oil and gas prices and the Company’s backlog for capital equipment. The full Board is also responsible for reviewing the Company’s strategy, business plan, and capital expenditure budget at least annually. The full Board also monitors our various enterprise wide risks, including, environmental and social risks and IT and cybersecurity risks (e.g. data privacy, business continuity, information security, etc.). Through these various functions, the Board is able to monitor these risks and assist the Company in determining whether certain mitigating actions, if any, need to be taken.

The Audit Committee serves an important role in providing risk oversight, as further detailed in its charter. One of the Audit Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities is to monitor the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, financial reporting processes, systems of internal controls regarding finance, and disclosure controls and procedures. The Audit Committee is also responsible for establishing procedures for the receipt, retention, response to and treatment of complaints, including confidential, anonymous submissions by the Company’s employees, regarding accounting, internal controls, disclosure or auditing matters, and providing an avenue of communication among the independent auditors, management, the internal audit function and the Board. In addition, the Audit Committee monitors the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Company considers the Audit Committee an important part of the risk management oversight process, and senior management works closely with the Audit Committee on these matters in managing material risks to the Company.

The other committees of the Board also assist in the risk oversight function. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for ensuring that the Board and its committees are appropriately constituted so that the Board and its directors may effectively meet their fiduciary obligations to stockholders and the Company. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is also responsible for monitoring and evaluating on an annual basis the effectiveness of the Board and management of the Company, including their effectiveness in implementing the policies and principles of the Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Compensation Committee is responsible for compensation of the Company’s directors and executive officers. These various responsibilities of these committees allow them to work with the Company to make sure these areas do not pose undue risks to the Company.

Risk Assessment in Compensation Programs

Consistent with SEC disclosure requirements, the Company, its Compensation Committee and the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant assess the Company’s executive and broad-based compensation programs on an annual basis and have concluded that the Company’s compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Although we reviewed all material compensation programs, we focused on the programs with variability of payout, with the ability of a participant to directly affect payout and the controls on participant action and payout.

- 23 -

During such review, we noted that the variable forms of compensation, namely the annual cash incentive program and long-term equity incentives, have structural limitations and other mitigating controls which are designed to prevent the Company from being exposed to unexpected or unbudgeted compensation cost. For example, bonus payments to an executive under the annual cash incentive program are capped at a certain percentage of the executive’s base salary, and the number of shares of restricted stock and stock options granted under the Company’s long-term equity incentive plan are fixed amounts of shares.

After such review and assessment, the Company, the Compensation Committee and the Compensation Committee’s consultant believe that the Company’s compensation policies and practices do not create inappropriate or unintended significant risk to the Company as a whole. The Company and the Compensation Committee also believe that the Company’s incentive compensation arrangements provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond the organization’s ability to effectively identify and manage significant risks, and are supported by the oversight and administration of the Compensation Committee with regard to executive compensation programs.

Anti-Hedging Policy

Our Board has adopted an Insider Trading Compliance Policy, which applies to each director, officer, employee and certain consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries. The policy prohibits each director, officer, employee and certain consultants from engaging in all hedging or monetization transactions, such as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds.

Policies on Business Ethics and Conduct

The Company has a long-standing Business Ethics Policy. In April 2003, the Board adopted the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Members of the Board of Directors and Executive Officers and the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers. These codes are designed to focus the Board and management on areas of ethical risk, provide guidance to personnel to help them recognize and deal with ethical issues, provide mechanisms to report unethical conduct and help to foster a culture of honesty and accountability. As set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board may not waive the application of the Company’s policies on business ethics and conduct for any director or executive officer. Copies of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Members of the Board of Directors and Executive Officers and the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, as well as the code of ethics applicable to employees of the Company, are available on the Company’s website, www.nov.com, under the Investors/Corporate Governance/Conduct and Ethics section. The Company will furnish print copies of these Codes to interested stockholders without charge, upon request. Written requests for such copies should be addressed to: Craig L. Weinstock, Secretary, NOV Inc., 7909 Parkwood Circle Drive, Houston, Texas 77036.

Corporate, Social and Environmental Responsibility

The Company’s approach to corporate, social and environmental responsibility revolves around protecting the health and safety of our employees, maintaining a diverse and inclusive environment, defending human rights across the globe, reducing the environmental footprint of our products, and improving our processes and technologies. We continuously strive to align our business strategies with our mission to support our people, environment, customers, and communities.

In 2019, the Company published its first sustainability report detailing its Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) approach. We encourage you to read our Environmental, Social, and Governance Report at:

www.nov.com/-/media/nov/files/about/corporate-responsibility/environmental-social-and-governance-report.pdf

- 24 -

Governance Hotline and Communications with Directors

The Company has established a hotline for any parties with an interest in the Company including, but not limited to employees and investors, to communicate with the Company’s non-management directors. Such communication, including complaints and concerns, can be reported confidentially and anonymously, where allowed by local law, via phone, email or mail to the contact information below. This hotline is part of the procedures established by the Company’s Audit Committee for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by the Company, in accordance with SEC regulation. Parties wishing to communicate with our non-employee directors may do so by calling 1-800-676-4380. This procedure is described on the Company’s website, www.nov.com, in the Investors/Corporate Governance/Conduct and Ethics section. Calls to this number will be answered by an independent, automated system 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.

Parties wishing to send written communications to the Board, other than sales-related communications, should send a letter addressed to the member or members of the Board to whom the communication is directed, care of the Secretary, NOV Inc., 7909 Parkwood Circle Drive, Houston, Texas, 77036. All such communications will be forwarded to the Board member or members specified.

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

The Company does not have a formal policy with respect to director attendance at annual stockholder meetings. In 2020, all members of the Board were in attendance at the annual meeting. As a safety precaution due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Board members attended the 2020 annual stockholder meeting by videoconference but were available for questions from shareholders.

NYSE Corporate Governance Matters

As a listed company with the NYSE, our Chief Executive Officer, as required under Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, must certify to the NYSE each year whether or not he is aware of any violation by the Company of NYSE Corporate Governance listing standards as of the date of the certification. On June 16, 2020, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer submitted such a certification to the NYSE which stated that he was not aware of any violation by the Company of the NYSE Corporate Governance listing standards.

On February 12, 2021, the Company filed its 2020 Form 10-K with the SEC, which included as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certifications required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

- 25 -

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following persons constitute our current named executive officers. The executive officers of the Company serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors and are subject to annual appointment by the Board of Directors. None of the executive officers, directors, or nominees for director has any family relationships with each other. Information regarding our current executive officers is below:

CLAY C. WILLIAMS, 58

		For a detailed description of Mr. Williams’ background, please refer to page 6.

JOSE A. BAYARDO, 49

		Mr. Bayardo has served as the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since August 2015. Prior to joining the Company in 2015, Mr. Bayardo served as Senior Vice President, Resource and Business Development at Continental Resources, Inc. and spent nine years serving in various roles at Complete Production Services, Inc. including Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Prior to joining Complete Production Services, Mr. Bayardo was an investment banker with J.P. Morgan. Mr. Bayardo holds a Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, a Master of Engineering Management from the McCormick School of Engineering at Northwestern University and a Master of Business Administration from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University.

- 26 -

SCOTT K. DUFF, 53

		Mr. Duff has served as the Company’s Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer since July 2014. Mr. Duff previously served as the Company’s Vice President of Internal Audit from 2005 to June 2014. Prior to joining NOV in 2004, Mr. Duff held accounting positions at KPMG, Ernst & Young LLP, and SBC. Mr. Duff holds a Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting from the University of Texas at San Antonio and is a Certified Public Accountant.

JOSEPH W. ROVIG, 60

		Mr. Rovig has served as the President of Rig Technologies since March 2014. Mr. Rovig has also served as Group Vice President of Global Operations, Vice President of the Eastern Hemisphere, Director of Service and Repair and Senior Vice President of the Offshore Drilling Equipment group within the Company’s Rig Technologies division. Prior to joining the Company, he worked for two drilling contractors in various positions, both domestically and internationally. Mr. Rovig’s internationally-based positions cover twenty years of experience with multiple locations in Asia and Europe.

- 27 -

CRAIG L. WEINSTOCK, 62

		Mr. Weinstock has served as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel since October 2014. Prior to his promotion, Mr. Weinstock served as the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer. Before joining the Company in October 2013, he practiced law at Locke Lord, LLP in Texas for 29 years counseling corporate boards and independent directors regarding governance, securities and compliance matters. While practicing with Locke Lord, Mr. Weinstock worked on behalf of the Company on a variety of matters. Mr. Weinstock holds a Bachelor of Arts from the State University of New York and a J.D. from Vanderbilt Law School.

- 28 -

STOCK OWNERSHIP

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

Based on information filed with the SEC as of the most recent practicable date, this table shows the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by owners of more than five percent of the outstanding shares of the common stock of the Company at December 31, 2020 (except where noted below). The number and percentage of shares of common stock beneficially owned is based on 388,225,374 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2020.

- 29 -

Security Ownership of Management

This table shows the number and percentage of shares of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned as of March 22, 2021 by each of our current directors and executive officers and by all current directors and executive officers as a group. The number and percentage of shares of common stock beneficially owned is based on 390,654,546 shares outstanding as of March 22, 2021. Beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the director or executive officer has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 22, 2021 through the exercise of any stock option, warrant or other right. Each stockholder has sole voting and investment power, or shares these powers with his spouse, with respect to the shares beneficially owned.

- 30 -

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

General Overview

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) describes our executive compensation program and provides information relevant to understanding the decisions our Compensation Committee has made under that program with regards to our named executive officers’ 2020 compensation.

The following is a list of our named executive officers by name and position, as of December 31, 2020:

Oil and Gas Market Downturn and COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic and related economic repercussions had an unprecedented impact on our business and our operations in 2020. Government ordered lockdowns led to severe declines in economic activity, including travel and other activities that severely depressed demand for oil and gas. Early in 2020, aggressive increases in production of oil by Saudi Arabia and Russia contributed to a significant surplus in the supply of oil. Sustained low oil prices led to severe spending reductions by the entire oil and gas industry as U.S. rig count fell to its lowest level since 1940 in August 2020.

The forced shutdown of economic activity directly affected our business and sharply reduced oil and natural gas prices. On April 20, 2020, West Texas Intermediate crude dropped by almost 300% trading at negative $37 per barrel. Demand for our products and services declined as our customers continued to revise their capital budgets downwards and swiftly adjusted their operations in response to lower commodity prices.

Throughout this crisis, the Company maintained a continuous process of actively managing its strategy, structure and resources to the changing market conditions and new realities. The Company closed or realigned hundreds of facilities, reduced headcount, sharply lowered costs and reviewed all product lines for acceptable returns in the evolved market. Additionally, the Company proactively reduced the balances and extended the maturity profile of its debt.

While aggressively matching size and spend to the market, and protecting its balance sheet, the Company has continued investing in new products and technologies that enable its customers to improve their operational efficiencies.

2020 Performance Amidst a Global Pandemic

Despite the challenging market conditions in 2020, the Company made significant progress towards our key priorities, which includes the following highlights:

- 31 -

COVID-19: Employee Safety and Health

In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic presented new challenges for our organization and the communities in which we operate. Naturally, the health and safety of our workforce is a top priority and we continue to engrain safety into our corporate culture and strive to conduct all our operations as safely as possible. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company implemented programs tailored to each location that included, among other things, working from home, virtual meetings, social distancing, masking, contact tracing and quarantining, facility and machine sanitizing, staggered work shifts, and staggered workdays.

2020 Executive Compensation Decisions

In response to the challenging operating environment in 2020, the Company made the following compensation changes:

- 32 -

Pay for Performance

Our Compensation Committee believes that the Company’s executive compensation program is appropriately designed to align executives’ interest with those of our shareholders and to reward based on performance. The majority of our executive officers’ total compensation opportunity is provided in “at-risk” compensation components and tied to the achievement of our annual and long-term performance goals.

Our annual incentives are tied to profitability and growth (Adjusted EBITDA) as well as improving capital efficiency and cash flow (working capital modifier).

Our long-term incentives are tied to our returns to shareholders: in absolute stock price gains, shareholder returns relative to industry peers, and improving absolute returns on capital relative to our cost of capital.

In 2020, we continued our emphasis on performance-based awards and maintained our measure of 3-year improvement in NVA (NOV Value Added, as defined on page 42) as an additional performance measure to the Company’s long-term performance shares. The Company believes that the adjusted EBITDA and adjusted working capital metrics are well-suited for short-term incentives, while TSR (total shareholder return) and NVA better serve as long-term incentive targets.

For 2020 the payouts under our “at-risk” incentive programs were as follows:

- 33 -

CEO Realizable Pay

The majority of the compensation value our CEO will ultimately receive is directly tied to the Company’s actual operational and financial performance and absolute and relative stock price performance.

The following table demonstrates the strong link between pay and performance by comparing the CEO’s intended target compensation value relative to his realizable value as of December 31, 2020.

In the chart above, “Target Compensation” refers to the annual target total compensation opportunities offered to the CEO across 2018, 2019 and 2020 and includes base salary, target bonus opportunity, and the grant date intended value of the long-term incentive awards in each of the three years. The amounts indicated in the Realizable columns refer to the corresponding amounts earned, or on track to be earned, from the 2018, 2019 and 2020 target compensation opportunities as of December 31, 2020. “Realizable Compensation” includes base salary and bonus actually earned each year as well as the intrinsic value of long-term incentive awards based on the Company’s closing stock price on December 31, 2020. Mr. Williams’ 2020 earned salary also incorporates the temporary reduction taken in May 2020. The salary reduction reduced his target bonus opportunity. The 2018 performance award reflects the actual payout of 186% of target based on the Company’s top quartile performance ranking relative to the OSX Index; 2019 and 2020 awards reflect 100% of target since the performance period for those awards will not be completed until December 2021 and 2022 respectively.

- 34 -

Good Pay Practices

Our compensation program and policies include key features that are designed to align the interests of our executives and stockholders and to mitigate compensation-related risks. The table below highlights our practices:

Shareholder Engagement

Throughout the year, management actively engaged in conversations and sought feedback on management’s approach to long-term planning for the business, including, but not limited to, cost right-sizing efforts in response to current market conditions, new technology research and development, and ESG matters.

- 35 -

Approach to Executive Compensation Program

Compensation Philosophy

The Company believes that in order to attract, motivate, and retain talented executives, its compensation program should be properly designed to:

Components of NOV’s Compensation Program:

Given the inherent nature of these forms of compensation and the cyclical nature of the industry in which we operate, the Company has tried to provide a balance between aligning pay with absolute performance and relative performance to peers through both up and down cycles.

There are no compensation policy differences among the individual executives, except that the more senior officers, such as our Chief Executive Officer, receive a higher compensation level with a greater percentage of that compensation “at-risk,” consistent with their increased responsibilities. These differences are reviewed and considered in connection with the compensation analysis performed by the Compensation Committee.

- 36 -

How Executive Compensation Decisions are Determined

Role of Compensation Committee

The Company’s executive compensation program is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee establishes specific compensation levels for the Company’s executive officers and administers the Company’s long-term incentive award plans.

The Compensation Committee’s objective regarding executive compensation is to design and implement a compensation program that will attract and retain the best available individuals to serve on the Company’s executive team and properly incentivize those executives to achieve the Company’s short-term and long-term financial and operational goals. To this end, the Compensation Committee strives to provide compensation packages for key executives that generally offer compensation opportunities competitive with the peer group of companies described below.

Role of Compensation Consultant

Since 2016, Meridian Compensation Partners (“Meridian”) has been engaged as the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant to serve as its advisor on executive compensation matters. The compensation consultants provided advice and analysis to the Compensation Committee on the design, structure and level of executive compensation. Meridian conducted a competitive review of executive compensation for the Company’s named executive officers relative to its peer companies, as well as to analyze internal pay equity, share usage and dilution. Meridian analyzed and compared each position’s responsibilities and job title to develop competitive market data based on data from proxy statements and other public filings. In November 2019, Meridian generated data on the components of the Company’s compensation program compared to the competitive market data range (25th percentile to 75th percentile) of the designated peer group.

Role of CEO and Management

Management plays an important role in assisting the Compensation Committee in determining executive compensation. At the request of the Compensation Committee, management works with Meridian to provide relevant information for the Compensation Committee to make informed decisions. Additionally, our CEO provides the Compensation Committee with his assessment of the performance of our other executive officers and recommends compensation for those officers.

Market Considerations

As part of its process to establish compensation levels for the Company’s named executive officers, the Compensation Committee compares each of the major elements of compensation (base salary, annual bonus and long-term incentives) for each of its named executive officers against the compensation provided to comparable executive officers at companies in a designated peer group.

The Company’s peer group, as approved by the Compensation Committee in 2019, was as follows:

- 37 -

Internal Considerations

While the Compensation Committee considers market-competitive levels in setting pay, it also considers numerous other factors such as tenure, individual performance, and level and scope of responsibility.

Specific to the CEO, the Compensation Committee also takes into account Mr. Williams’ successful achievement of most of his goals and objectives when setting his compensation opportunity. For 2020, Mr. Williams’ performance was measured in four key areas of the Company:

2020 Compensation Actions

The following section describes the elements of the Company’s compensation program for 2020, why the elements were selected, and how the amounts of each element were determined. The mix of target total compensation for our CEO and other named executive officers is shown in the chart below:

Base Salary

Salary adjustments are typically based on the individual’s experience and background, the individual’s performance during the prior year, the general movement of salaries in the marketplace, our financial position and, for each executive other than the Chief Executive Officer, the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer.

None of our named executive officers received an increase in 2020 or 2021 due to the current economic environment. In May 2020, Mr. Williams’ base salary was voluntarily reduced by 20% through the remainder of the year to reflect the deteriorating industry conditions in 2020. Prior to the reduction, Mr. Williams’ base salary was in the 12^th percentile of the Company’s peer group.

- 38 -

Annual Incentive Plan

The objectives of the Company’s annual cash incentive plan are to incent performance to achieve the Company’s corporate growth and profitability goals, encourage smart investments and prudent return on capital, and provide competitive compensation opportunities to attract and retain high quality management talent.

Annual Incentive Award Opportunities

Annual incentive opportunities are provided to the Company’s named executive officers under the Company’s 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan. Each year, the Compensation Committee establishes the target annual incentive opportunity for each named executive officer as a specified percentage of his or her base salary. These target percentages are based on each executive’s level of responsibility for the Company’s financial performance. Incentive payouts will vary based on actual performance against performance objectives. The Compensation Committee did not make any changes to the named executive officers’ target annual incentive opportunities for 2020.

Performance Metrics

The incentive plan provides for cash awards if the Company achieves certain pre-established financial objectives based on the Company’s financial plan. The Company’s annual financial plan is established through a comprehensive budget and financial planning process, which includes a detailed analysis of the Company’s market outlook, available strategic alternatives, and anticipated cost reductions and it is approved by the Board each year.

Adjusted EBITDA was selected as a measure for the 2020 annual incentive plan given our continued focus on the operating profitability of our business and the ongoing macroeconomic challenges in the oil and gas industry. The Company discloses Adjusted EBITDA in its periodic earnings press releases and other public disclosures to provide investors additional information about the results of ongoing operations. In 2020, the Company included a Working Capital Modifier in the annual incentive plan. First introduced in 2018, the purpose of the working capital modifier is to drive improvements in capital efficiency and cash flow.

- 39 -

Payout Calibration

Payouts under the annual incentive plan are formulaically determined and vary based on performance against pre-established objectives. The EBITDA metric has a Threshold, Target, and Maximum level of achievement, which corresponds to a Threshold, Target, and Maximum level of payout. Below the threshold level of performance, there is no payout. The payout is capped once the Maximum performance level is achieved.

Payout Results

Our 2020 goals were established prior to the significant impact of the pandemic and the reduction in oil & gas prices. We did not adjust our goals following the significant decline in demand for our products. As a result, we did not achieve our threshold level of EBITDA and actual bonuses paid to executives were calculated as follows:

Working Capital Modifier

- 40 -

2020 Annual Incentive Compensation Bonus Payouts

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

The primary purpose of the Company’s long-term incentive compensation program is to:

In 2020, we continued to increase our emphasis on performance-based awards. The executives’ long-term incentive awards are benchmarked to ensure the type, value and amount of each award are consistent with market practices and aligned with the Company’s philosophy.

Grant date target equity values for the named executive officers’ long-term incentive awards were decreased by 10% from the 2019 levels. Additionally, the weighting of performance shares was increased from 40% to 50% of the 2020 long-term incentive awards (remaining awards weighted by value 25% in options and 25% in restricted stock).

- 41 -

Based on the foregoing, on February 25, 2020, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of stock options, restricted stock awards and performance share awards to the Company’s executive officers pursuant to the National Oilwell Varco, Inc. 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan:

Stock Options

The options were granted at a price equal to the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of approval of the grants by the Compensation Committee ($20.23 per share). Each of such options has a term of 10 years and vests in three equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant.

Restricted Stock

The restricted stock awards granted shall vest in three equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

Performance Share Awards

The performance share awards can be earned based on performance against pre-established goals and vest three years from the grant date (performance period is January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022). The performance share awards are divided into two independent parts that are subject to two separate performance metrics: 85% in value based on the Company’s TSR (total shareholder return) goal and 15% in value based on the Company’s internal NVA goal (returns-based metric).

The TSR goal can be only be achieved if the percentile ranking of the Company’s TSR (total shareholder return) as measured against the TSR of the constituent members of the OSX Index over a three-year performance period exceeds certain levels. The Compensation Committee believes that the members of the OSX index are an appropriate benchmark against which to compare the Company’s TSR performance.

The TSR goal is subject to a vesting cap equal to 100% of the target level if the Company’s absolute TSR over the performance period is negative, regardless of relative TSR results. Conversely, if the Company’s absolute TSR is greater than 15% annualized over the performance period, the payout amount shall not be less than 50% of the target level, regardless of relative TSR results.

The following table summarizes the absolute TSR collar limitation:

The NVA goal is based on the Company’s improvement in NVA (NOV Value Added) from the beginning of the three-year performance period until the end of the performance period. NVA shall be calculated as an amount equal to the Company’s (a) gross cash earnings less (b) average gross operating assets times a 9% required return on assets. Additionally, the NVA component requires that the Company reach breakeven and earn the cost of capital before the maximum target level will be paid.

- 42 -

The following table summarizes the payout thresholds for the 2020 performance share awards:

Results falling between threshold, target, and maximum will result in a linearly interpolated payout.

2018 Performance Share Awards Results

For the 2018-2020 performance period, the Company’s TSR ranked at the 71^st percentile relative to the constituent members of the OSX index. The TSR performance was in between the target and maximum levels, resulting in 186% of the target shares vesting. The performance share cycle commenced on January 1, 2018 and ended on December 31, 2020. The TSR calculation ranks the Company’s stock performance against the OSX peer group using the average of the first and last 30 days of the vesting period and assumes the reinvestment of dividends. At the time the results of the 2018 performance awards were certified by the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee determined that the portion of the 2018 performance award that was earned in excess of the target level (i.e., 86%) would be paid in cash rather than shares of common stock of the Company, as permitted by the National Oilwell Varco, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan. The cash payment was based upon the fair market value of the excess shares, as determined by the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock on February 22, 2021, the date the award was certified in writing by the Compensation Committee.

Retirement, Health and Welfare Benefits

The Company offers retirement, health, welfare and wellness programs to all eligible employees. The Company’s executive officers generally are eligible for the same benefit programs on the same basis as the rest of the Company’s employees. The health and welfare programs cover medical, pharmacy, dental, vision, life, accidental death and dismemberment and disability insurance. A selection of supplemental benefits is also available for employees to elect at their own expense. U.S. employees may also earn wellness incentives by participating in voluntary wellness activities.

The Company offers retirement programs that are intended to supplement the employee’s personal savings. The programs include the National Oilwell Varco, Inc. 401(k) and Retirement Savings Plan (“401k Plan”) and the National Oilwell Varco, Inc. Supplemental Savings Plan (“Supplemental Plan”). The Company’s U.S. employees, including its executives, are generally eligible to participate in the 401k Plan. Employees of the Company whose base salary meets or exceeds a certain dollar threshold and whose position is deemed to be eligible as established by the Company’s benefits plan administrative committee are generally eligible to participate in the Supplemental Plan. Participation in the 401k Plan and Supplemental Plan are voluntary. The Supplemental Plan is a non-qualified plan that allows participants to continue saving and receiving Company contributions towards retirement when, due to compensation and contribution ceilings established under the Internal Revenue Code, they or the Company can no longer contribute to the 401k Plan.

- 43 -

Changes to the Company’s 2020 Retirement and Supplemental Plan Contributions

Due to the deteriorating operating environment in 2020, the Company implemented several changes to the employer match and retirement contributions for both the 401k Plan and the Supplemental Plan. Beginning on January 1, 2020, the employer retirement contribution compensation percentages for the 401k Plan were reduced and on May 15, 2020, the Company suspended all employer match and retirement contributions made on behalf of eligible employee participants (excluding some union groups) under both the 401k Plan and the Supplemental Plan.

U.S. Income Tax Limits on Deductibility

Code Section 162(m) limits the Company’s ability to deduct compensation paid in any given year to our “covered employees” (as defined by Section 162(m), generally, our current and former named executive officers) in excess of $1.0 million. Prior to the enactment of legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”), Section 162(m) provided an exception from this deduction limit for certain forms of “performance-based compensation,” which included the gain recognized by covered employees upon the exercise of compensatory stock options and on the vesting of performance share awards. The TCJA repealed the performance-based compensation exemption under Section 162(m), effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, subject to certain transition relief. This repeal means that compensation paid to our covered employees in excess of the $1.0 million compensation limitation under Code Section 162(m) will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017, commonly referred to as grandfathered amounts.

In the past, our Compensation Committee generally sought to structure performance-based compensation for our covered employees in a manner that complies with Section 162(m) in order to provide for the deductibility of such compensation to the extent possible. Our Compensation Committee generally will continue to emphasize performance-based compensation, even though it may no longer be deductible. The Compensation Committee has authorized and expects in the future to authorize compensation in excess of $1.0 million to covered employees, which will not be deductible under Section 162(m), when it believes doing so is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

Our Compensation Committee will endeavor to maintain the deductibility of grandfathered amounts going forward, except where it determines in its business judgment (as done from time to time in the past) that it is in our best interest to provide for compensation that may not be fully deductible. Because of ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m) and the guidance issued thereunder, including the uncertain scope of the transition relief for grandfathered amounts, no assurance can be given that compensation intended to satisfy the requirements for exception from the Section 162(m) deduction limit in fact will satisfy the exception.

Option Grant Practices

Historically, the Company has granted stock options to its key employees, including executives, in the first quarter of the year. The Company does not have any program, plan or practice to time its option grants to its executives in coordination with the release of material non-public information and has not timed its release of material non-public information for the purposes of affecting the value of executive compensation. The Company does not set the grant date of its stock option grants to new executives in coordination with the release of material non-public information.

The Compensation Committee has the responsibility of approving any Company stock option grants and does not delegate material aspects of long-term incentive plan administration to any other person. The Company’s senior executives in coordination with the Compensation Committee set a time for the Compensation Committee to meet during the first quarter of the year to review and approve stock option grants proposed by the senior executives. The specific timing of the meeting during the quarter is dependent

- 44 -

on committee member schedules and availability and the Company finalizing its stock option grant proposal. If approved by the Compensation Committee, the grant date for stock option awards is the date the Compensation Committee meets and approves the grant, with the exercise price for the option equal to the Company’s closing stock price on the date of grant.

The Company recognizes that its stock price fluctuates over time and in certain cases quite significantly. As stock option grants have historically been granted on an annual basis during the first quarter of the calendar year, executives who have been employed with the Company for some time have received grants with varying exercise prices. The ten-year term of the options also helps reward its executives who remain with the Company, as it provides the executives time, so long as they continue employment with the Company, to realize financial benefits from their option grants after vesting.

Recoupment Policy

On March 23, 2018, the Compensation Committee approved the Company’s Clawback Policy to allow the Compensation Committee, at its sole discretion, to terminate any award of stock options, performance awards and/or restricted stock if it determines that the recipient of such award has engaged in material misconduct that requires the Company to make a restatement of its reported financial statements. A similar clawback provision was included in the National Oilwell Varco, Inc. 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the participants’ equity award agreements. For purposes of this clawback policy, material misconduct includes conduct adversely affecting the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or conduct which constitutes fraud or theft of Company assets, any of which require the Company to make a restatement of its reported financial statements. If any material misconduct results in any error in financial information used in the determination of compensation paid to the recipient of any equity award and the effect of such error is to increase the payment amount pursuant to such award, the Compensation Committee may also require the recipient to reimburse the Company for all or a portion of such increase in compensation provided in connection with any such award. In addition, if there is a material restatement of the Company’s financial statements that affects the financial information used to determine the compensation paid to the recipient of an award, then the Compensation Committee may take whatever action it deems appropriate to adjust such compensation.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Executives

The Company adopted stock ownership guidelines for its executive officers in February 2013 and amended in November 2020. The Company’s stock ownership guidelines for its executive officers are intended to align the interests of the Company’s executive officers and the Company’s stockholders by requiring executives to accumulate and retain a meaningful amount of the Company’s stock. Under the Company’s guidelines, the executive officers must comply with the following ownership requirements:

The Company’s executive officers must attain the applicable stock ownership level within five years after first becoming subject to the guidelines. The following shares of Company stock count towards compliance with the guidelines: shares owned by the executive; shares owned jointly by the executive and his or her spouse; shares held in a trust established by the executive for the benefit of the executive and his or her family members; shares equal to the number of vested deferred stock units credited to the executive; shares equal to the in-the-money portion of any vested, unexercised options; unvested shares of time-based restricted stock or restricted stock units; and shares credited to the executive’s 401(k) plan account. Unvested and unearned performance shares or units and unvested stock options do not count towards compliance guidelines. For purposes of determining compliance with the guidelines, as of January 1 of each

- 45 -

year, the executive’s total eligible shares (as described above) will be multiplied by the greater of a) the average of the month-end closing prices of the Company’s common stock for the prior twelve months or b) the value on the date of grant or purchase. All of the Company’s named executive officers are currently in compliance with the Company’s stock ownership guidelines as of January 1, 2021.

Compensation Consultant Independence

In furtherance of maintaining the independence of the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain or terminate its compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves total expenditures paid to the independent compensation consultant. Meridian and its affiliates did not provide any services to the company or any of the company’s affiliates other than advising the Compensation Committee on director and executive officer compensation during 2020.

Recent Developments for 2021 Compensation

On February 22, 2021, the Compensation Committee, in connection with its annual review of executive compensation and performance, and in consultation with Meridian, approved the base salaries, annual incentive targets and long-term incentive awards of the Company’s executive officers. The Compensation Committee decided to maintain our general approach to executive compensation, with an emphasis on short and long-term incentive compensation that rewards our executives when they achieve the Company’s financial and operational goals and deliver value for our stockholders. Additionally, the Compensation Committee decided to hold 2021 base salary, annual bonus targets and the 2020 reduced value of long-term incentive awards flat relative to the prior year for all named executive officers.

Compensation Committee Report

The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee, which are set forth in the Compensation Committee Charter adopted by the Board of Directors, include approving and evaluating all compensation of directors and executive officers, including salaries, bonuses, and compensation plans, policies and programs of the Company.

We have reviewed and discussed with senior management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section included in this proxy statement. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s 2021 Proxy Statement.

Members of the Compensation Committee

Ben A. Guill, Committee Chair

Eric L. Mattson

William R. Thomas

- 46 -

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth for the year ended December 31, 2020 the compensation paid by the Company to its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and three other most highly compensated executive officers (the “Named Executive Officers”) serving in such capacity at December 31, 2020.

Summary Compensation Table

- 47 -

The following table provides information concerning stock options and restricted stock awards granted to Named Executive Officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. The Company has granted no stock appreciation rights to the Named Executive Officers.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

- 48 -

Exercises and Holdings of Previously-Awarded Equity Disclosure

The following table provides information regarding outstanding awards that have been granted to Named Executive Officers where the ultimate outcomes of such awards have not been realized, as of December 31, 2020.

- 49 -

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End